#The foundry modo 12.1v2 professional
Unlike the pioneering days of desktop graphics work – the late 1990s and early 2000s, when companies like 3Dlabs, Intergraph and ELSA were still building specialised hardware specifically aimed at professional users – today’s professional and consumer cards use essentially the same hardware, with a few key differences. This brings me on to an important point: the differences between consumer and professional cards.
#The foundry modo 12.1v2 pro
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 has basically the same specs as AMD’s Radeon RX Vega 56 gaming card, but with faster ECC RAM, and is tuned to work with DCC software, not games. The WX 8200 is a 230W card, with that power supplied by two PCIe connectors: one 6-pin and one 8-pin. I used the adaptors provided while benchmarking the WX 8200 and they worked without any problems.
If your monitor doesn’t have Mini DisplayPort ports, the card comes with adaptors for alternative connector types (four for full-size DisplayPort, one for HDMI 2.0, and one for single link DVI), and you can pick up additional Mini-to-full-size-DisplayPort cables for around $7 online. It can drive up to four displays at 4K resolution or lower, three at 5K resolution, or a single display at 8K resolution. The GPU has access to 8GB of HBM2 ECC memory on a 2,048-bit interface for a memory bandwidth of 512 GB/s.įor display, the WX 8200 has four Mini DisplayPort 1.4 outputs, supporting 8- and 10-bit colour depths. It’s a 14nm Vega-based GPU with 56 compute units, providing 10.75 Tflops of peak single-precision (FP32) performance, and 672 Gflops of double-precision (FP64) performance. The WX 8200 is a high-end GPU, slotting in just under AMD’s current top-of-the-range workstation card, the Radeon Pro WX 9100. In this review, we will be looking at one of the newest of those Vega cards, and AMD’s latest offering in the professional GPU space: the Radeon Pro WX 8200.
#The foundry modo 12.1v2 series
While Nvidia still seems to hold the ultimate performance crown with its new RTX series of graphics cards, in the mid-range, upper-mid-range, and professional sectors, the Vega-based AMD GPUs can put some pressure on the Green Group’s products, particularly when it comes to bang for your buck. Jason Lewis puts it through his real-world benchmark tests alongside two competing Nvidia GPUs.Īfter what felt like an eternity of modest – in my view, mediocre – year-over-year improvements in hardware, the last couple of years have been pretty spectacular for desktop PCs and workstations.ĪMD’s launch of its new Ryzen and Threadripper processors has once again put serious competition in the CPU space, forcing Intel to be competitive again, and the same holds true with its Vega GPU architecture. AMD’s latest workstation graphics card provides professional artists with considerable bang for their buck.